Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
null
Bulletin of the EAFP
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Case study
    • Method
    • Note
    • Opinion
    • Research article
    • Review
    • Workshop Report
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://eafpbulletin.scholasticahq.com/feed
Research article
Vol. 45, Issue 2, 2025June 05, 2025 CEST

Fibromas and a fibro-osteoma in four commercial fish species from water of the Arabian Gulf

M. A. Mahmoud, Ph.D.., Mustafa Ibrahim, Ph.D.., Alhizab F. A., Ph.D.., Aljazzar A, Ph.D..,
FibromasFibro osteomaMarine fishesHistopathologyThe Arabian Gulf
Copyright Logoccby-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.48045/001c.140568
Photo by Sogand Gh on Unsplash
Bulletin of the EAFP
Mahmoud, M. A., Mustafa Ibrahim, Alhizab F. A., and Aljazzar A. 2025. “Fibromas and a Fibro-Osteoma in Four Commercial Fish Species from Water of the Arabian Gulf.” Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 45 (2). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48045/​001c.140568.
Save article as...▾
Download all (4)
  • Figure 1. A-D, neoplastic overgrowth (fibroma) observed externally on the head region of Bartail flathead. (A): The tumor mass at the lower jaw (lower photo) of the mouth opening (arrow) compared with non-affected fish ( upper photo). (B): The tumor mass was large round well circumscribed, solitary, at the anterior aspect of the lower jaw ; and it was about 2.5 cm in diameter. (C): The tumor attached firmly to the skin of this region forming a ring of constriction (arrow). (D): It was fleshy in consistency, covered with intact skin layer and the cut surface appeared white in color (arrow). E&F: Gross photos of fibro osteoma in Bartail flathead showing (E): Focal pedunculated round very hard swelling on the dorsal fin of the examined fish. (F): Higher magnification of the previous photo showing the neoplastic mass measured 1cmX0.5 cm and extended bilaterally on the both sides of the dorsal fin.
    Download
  • Figure 2. A&B, Neoplastic overgrowth (fibroma) observed in Spangled emperor showing (A): The same type of the tumor (fibroma), the tumor mass lesion was observed at the posterior end of the left side of the operculum (arrow). (B): The tumor mass was well circumscribed in its shape, 20 mm in diameter, firm in consistency and in cut section , the color appeared white and the lesion was avascular (arrow). C-E, neoplastic overgrowth (fibroma) observed in Areolated grouper; F, the neoplasm (fibroma) in Javan flounder showing (C): The neoplastic mass was palpated as fleshy nodular mass deeply embedded in the dorsal muscular tissue of the anal fin (arrow). (D&E): Cut section in the site of the neoplastic mass, the fibroma appeared pale and well circumscribed in shape (arrows). (F): The tumor in Javan flounder (arrow) was located in the ventral aspect of the fish near the dorsal fin, the tumor masses was about 1.5 cm in diameter, round Fleshy, soft in consistency ,and white in cut section (arrow).
    Download
  • Figure 3. Histopathological micrographs of the neoplastic mass, (A-D), in Bartail flathead and (E), in Spangled emperor showing (A): The outermost part of the neoplasm covered by a peripheral pigmented skin layer (p) while the middle part formed of proliferated fibroblasts (f). (B): The core of the neoplastic tissue formed of cellular part of fibrous connective tissue proliferation (ce) with characteristic spindle shape nuclei of the fibroblasts and deposition of collagen fibers (e) indicating mature fibroblasts. (C): Higher magnification of the previous photo demonstrating oedema between collagen fibres (e). (D): neoblastic tissue, fibroma (f) with dilated lymph (lv) and blood vessels (bv). (E): Nearly the same lesions of fibroma (f) in Spangled emperor with the characteristic collagen bundles interspersed with fibroblasts. (H&E stain)
    Download
  • Figure 4. Histopathological micrographs of fibro-osteoma in Bartail flathead showing (A): Mixed neoplastic tissues formed of bony trabeculae (b) and prominent fibrous tissue (f) indicating fibro- osteoma. (B): The bony trabeculae surrounded with osteoblast and osteocytes (o). (C): The interlacing fibrous tissue (f) between the bony trabeculae (b) showed dilated blood vessels (bv). (D): Special histochemical staining of the neoplastic bony tissue formed of both old bones (ob), stained red and new bone (nb), stained blue with prominent fibrous tissue (f) formation. (E): The formed fibrous tissue (f) appeared regularly arranged, with whirling appearance and without criteria of malignancy, but with peripheral edema (arrow). (F): Special histochemical staining of the neoplastic fibrous tissue (f) appeared with the characteristic blue colour. (A-D&E: H&E stain; D&F: MT stain)
    Download

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

If this problem reoccurs, please contact Scholastica Support

Error message:

undefined

View more stats

Abstract

Conspicuous neoplastic overgrowths were observed in different marine fish species caught from El-Jubial province, the water of the Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia, during the routine veterinary work of fish inspection in fish landing stations and fish markets. Only a single neoplastic tissue mass was observed in each of the following four fish species: In the first species, Bartail flathead (Platycephalus indicus), two types of neoplastic masses were noticed in two fish: a fibroma and a fibro-osteoma in each fish. In the other three species examined, Spangled emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus), Areolated grouper (Epinephelus areolatus) and Javan flounder (Pseudorbombus Javanicus), only fibromas were diagnosed. The diagnosis of the neoplastic overgrowths was confirmed using gross, histopathological, and histochemical techniques. The cellular evidence revealed a prominent picture of fibromas in the four examined fish species at different locations on the body surfaces and additional case of fibro-osteoma on the dorsal region of the body in Bartail flathead. Characteristic fibroblast proliferation with interlacing fibrous bundles and deposition of collagen fibers, edema, and dilated lymph and blood vessels were common findings in some of the examined fishe showing fibromas, while additional bony trabeculae were observed in the neoplastic mass which was diagnosed as fibro-osteoma on the dorsal fin of the Bartail flathead.

The necropsy examination of all affected fish exhibited no evidence of metastasis into internal visceral organs. From our study we could conclude that the neoplasms originating from fibrous and bony tissue are not uncommon in these fish species in the Arabian Gulf region, and further complementary studies are required to determine the potential correlation of human activities, especially oil pollution and industrial contaminants, to the neoplastic overgrowths in such fish species in this region.

Introduction

A neoplasm is an abnormal mass of tissue that is not coordinated with the growth of normal tissue and exceeds the growth of the normal tissues; it may be benign or malignant. The benign one is a confined development of well-structured, non-invasive tissue; its growth occurs through expansion, and it can exert pressure on neighboring healthy tissues. Generally, benign tumors expand at a slow rate and are typically not life-threatening unless they disrupt essential functions of the body (Gomes 2022). Contrarily, the malignant neoplasm (cancer) is life-threatening and recently defined as unregulated growth of altered cells influenced by evolution through natural selection and has a character of metastasis or distance spread to different parts of the body other than its original site (Brown et al. 2023). Localized invasion of surrounding tissues, anaplasia, dysplasia, cellular polymorphism, and atypical mitosis, together with other criteria of malignancy, are the additional behavioral and cellular characteristics of the malignant neoplasms (Baba and Catoi 2007).

Fish tumors received attention, especially those with a relationship to marine pollution (Sindermann 1976, 1979, 1990; Stich et al. 1977; Overstreet 1988; Fournie and Vogelbein 1994). However, fish are good bioindicators for environmental pollution because of their relatively long lifespans, and they are especially vulnerable to water contamination from the environment (Morado, Araújo, and Gomes 2017).

Jubail Province is a heavily industrialized region on the Arabian Gulf in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, with the potential of environmental pollution (Jawad and Ibrahim 2021). Many industrial contaminants are known to be teratogenic as well as mutagens and carcinogens (Sindermann 1990). Several classes of chemical carcinogens have been shown to induce neoplasia in laboratory fishes with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PHAs) (Oishi, Yamazaki, and Harada 1976; Watermann, Dethlefsen, and Happenheit 1982). Different fish species could be affected by different types of neoplasms originating from different tissues, either epithelial or mesenchymal, where spindle cell tumors are common spontaneous cutaneous neoplasms observed in fish, and it was noticed in many fish species (Groff 2004). Fibromas are benign tumors composed of bundles of spindle-shaped cells having a fibrocytic or fibroblastic appearance arranged in a whirling pattern along with abundant collagen (Handharyani et al. 2008). In different animal species other than teleosts, the neoplastic overgrowth may be originate from more than one tissue of origin: fibrous and bony tissues, with the end result of fibro-osteomas (Soltero-Rivera et al. 2015; Nottle et al. 2021; Razmyar et al. 2008). In contrast to fibromas in different animal species, including fishes, the available literature about fibro-osteomas in fishes is scarce. On the other side, fibromas were recorded in many ornamental fishes, such as goldfish (Shokrpoor et al. 2016; Kamalesh, Chandy, and Bedre 2021); angelfish (Grosset, ME, and Groff 2016); white skirt tetra (Shalizar-Jalali et al. 2020); parrotfish (Grizzle and Williams 1983); and anciently in some edible fishes, such as trout (kreyberg 1937); major carp (Pillai and Thampy 1990); and recently in largescale mullet (Planiliza macrolepis) (Mariasingrayan, Danaraj, Dinh-Hung, et al. 2024).

To the best of our knowledge, there were few previous studies on inconsiderable details, especially on fibromas and fibro-osteomas found in the commercial fish species inhabiting the water of the Arabian Gulf in the Jubail region. During the course of investigation for fish health at El- Jubial fish markets, remarkable growths were found on the external surfaces of some edible fishes (four fish species) at different sites on their bodies, so the present study was undertaken to describe the gross morphology and associated histopathological lesions of these neoplastic masses, their distribution (positioning) on the body of the affected fishes, and to discuss the potential impact of the anthropogenic activities and pollution on the occurrence of fish neoplasms at Jubial Province.

Materials and Methods

Fish samples

The present study was carried out for two years during the veterinary investigation of fish health conditions at El-Jubial Fish market, the main fish landing center station at the marine fisheries port from the coastal waters of the Jubial province (27’°0’28’‘N, 49° °39’36’'E). Fishes showing the neoplastic lesions were identified according to Carpenter et al. (1997). The total length and weight of each fish were measured to the nearest cm and gm or kg. The body surface, fins and head of each fish were inspected both visually and by palpation by hand, together with internal post-mortem examination for any neoplastic masses in the internal organs. A remarkable single abnormal growth was observed on each of the four examined commercial fish species. In 250 examined Bartail flathead, two fish showed a rounded, well-circumscribed neoplastic overgrowth; one of them was on the head region, and it was firmly attached to the lower jaw (the fish was 35 cm in length and 1.5 kg in weight); in the second affected fish of this species, the neoplasm was hard and attached to the dorsal fin. In the spangled emperor, one out of 300 examined fish showed a tumor mass at the posterior end of the left side of the operculum; the affected fish sample was 55 cm in length and 2.250 kg in weight. A neoplastic overgrowth in the areolated grouper was observed as a swelling underneath the muscular tissue in the ventral region of the fish (one out of 200 examined fish), near the caudal peduncle (the fish was 30 cm in length and 2.75 kg in weight). In Javan flounder, 150 fish were examined, and the neoplasm was found in one case at the ventral aspect of the fish near to the dorsal fin, and the fish was 20 cm in length and 280 g in weight.

For histopathological examination

A part of the abnormal growths was fixed in Bouin’s solution for 48 hr. and processed for routine paraffin histology. Sections were cut at 5 µm and stained with Harris, hematoxylin, and eosin (Luna 1968). Tumors were examined under Olympus BX50 and its associated software. Special histochemical Masson’s trichrome staining (MT stain) was performed to demonstrate collagen fiber in the neoplastic tissue and to confirm bony tissue proliferation (differentiate newly formed and old bones) (Lim, Lee, Yun, et al. 2013).

Results

Gross lesions

Tumor occurrence

A single neoplastic tissue mass was observed in each of the following four fish species: the neoplastic overgrowth of one fish, Bartail flathead observed externally on the head region (Fig. 1A), where the tumor mass appeared well circumscribed and brownish, related to the skin coloration of this fish species. It was about 2.5 cm in diameter and attached to the anterior aspect of the lower jaw of the mouth opening (Fig. 1B). The tumor mass was large, round and forming a constriction ring at the site of its attachment to the skin (Fig. 1C). In the cut section, the tumor was fleshy in consistency, white in appearance, and covered with intact skin (Fig. 1D). In another fish, the Bartail flathead, the tumor was observed as a focal pedunculated, round, very hard swelling on the dorsal fin of the examined fish. (Fig. 1E); the neoplastic mass measured 0.5 cm and extended bilaterally on the dorsal fin (Fig. 1F).

D:Not copiedResearch and projecsشغل د. مصطفى أخر كلامأبحاث الأورامأبحاث منتهيهFibroma and Fibroosteomaالبحث نهائى بعد ضم كل الأنواعSubmission to JournalsSubmission to EAFP. Major revisionAuthor reply on reviewer commentscorrected photosP1.jpg
Figure 1.A-D, neoplastic overgrowth (fibroma) observed externally on the head region of Bartail flathead. (A): The tumor mass at the lower jaw (lower photo) of the mouth opening (arrow) compared with non-affected fish ( upper photo). (B): The tumor mass was large round well circumscribed, solitary, at the anterior aspect of the lower jaw ; and it was about 2.5 cm in diameter. (C): The tumor attached firmly to the skin of this region forming a ring of constriction (arrow). (D): It was fleshy in consistency, covered with intact skin layer and the cut surface appeared white in color (arrow). E&F: Gross photos of fibro osteoma in Bartail flathead showing (E): Focal pedunculated round very hard swelling on the dorsal fin of the examined fish. (F): Higher magnification of the previous photo showing the neoplastic mass measured 1cmX0.5 cm and extended bilaterally on the both sides of the dorsal fin.

In Spangled emperor, the tumor mass was observed at the posterior end of the left side of the operculum (Fig. 2A), and it was well circumscribed in its shape (20 mm in diameter) and firm in consistency, and in the cut section , the color appeared white and avascular (Fig. 2B).

In Areolated grouper, the neoplasm was observed as a fleshy, nodular, and swollen mass deep in the lateral aspect of the muscular tissue near the anal fin (Fig. 2C&D). In the cut section, it appeared pale and well circumscribed, and it was about 1.5 cm in diameter (Fig. 2E). In Javan flounder, the neoplasm was round, fleshy, soft in consistency, and white in cut section (Fig. 2F).

In the necropsy examination, there were no gross lesions for any neoplastic overgrowth, where all the internal organs were apparently normal.

D:Not copiedResearch and projecsشغل د. مصطفى أخر كلامأبحاث الأورامأبحاث منتهيهFibroma and Fibroosteomaالبحث نهائى بعد ضم كل الأنواعSubmission to JournalsSubmission to EAFP. Major revisionAuthor reply on reviewer commentscorrected photosP2.jpg
Figure 2.A&B, Neoplastic overgrowth (fibroma) observed in Spangled emperor showing (A): The same type of the tumor (fibroma), the tumor mass lesion was observed at the posterior end of the left side of the operculum (arrow). (B): The tumor mass was well circumscribed in its shape, 20 mm in diameter, firm in consistency and in cut section , the color appeared white and the lesion was avascular (arrow). C-E, neoplastic overgrowth (fibroma) observed in Areolated grouper; F, the neoplasm (fibroma) in Javan flounder showing (C): The neoplastic mass was palpated as fleshy nodular mass deeply embedded in the dorsal muscular tissue of the anal fin (arrow). (D&E): Cut section in the site of the neoplastic mass, the fibroma appeared pale and well circumscribed in shape (arrows). (F): The tumor in Javan flounder (arrow) was located in the ventral aspect of the fish near the dorsal fin, the tumor masses was about 1.5 cm in diameter, round Fleshy, soft in consistency ,and white in cut section (arrow).

Histopathological findings

The fibromas were diagnosed in Bartail flathead, and nearly the same histopathological picture was observed in Spangled emperor, Areolated grouper, and Javan flounder. In Bartail flathead, the outermost part of the neoplasm was covered with a pigmented skin layer (Fig. 3A), and the core of the neoplastic tissue underlying the skin was formed of fibrous connective tissue proliferation with the characteristic spindle shape and deposition of collagen fibers, indicating mature fibroblasts and a tumor, fibroma (Fig. 3B and C). The collagen fibers were separated by edema (Fig. 3C). Dilated lymph and blood vessels (Fig. 3D) were not uncommon findings. The fibro-osteoma was diagnosed in another fish, the Bartail flathead, where the histopathological examination in such a case showed the typical histopathological evidence of fibro-osteoma.

D:Not copiedResearch and projecsشغل د. مصطفى أخر كلامأبحاث الأورامأبحاث منتهيهFibroma and Fibroosteomaالبحث نهائى بعد ضم كل الأنواعSubmission to JournalsSubmission to EAFP. Major revisionAuthor reply on reviewer commentscorrected photosP3.jpg
Figure 3.Histopathological micrographs of the neoplastic mass, (A-D), in Bartail flathead and (E), in Spangled emperor showing (A): The outermost part of the neoplasm covered by a peripheral pigmented skin layer (p) while the middle part formed of proliferated fibroblasts (f). (B): The core of the neoplastic tissue formed of cellular part of fibrous connective tissue proliferation (ce) with characteristic spindle shape nuclei of the fibroblasts and deposition of collagen fibers (e) indicating mature fibroblasts. (C): Higher magnification of the previous photo demonstrating oedema between collagen fibres (e). (D): neoblastic tissue, fibroma (f) with dilated lymph (lv) and blood vessels (bv). (E): Nearly the same lesions of fibroma (f) in Spangled emperor with the characteristic collagen bundles interspersed with fibroblasts. (H&E stain)

The neoplastic tissues formed of mixed tissue proliferation of both bony trabeculae and prominent fibroblasts (Fig. 4A). The bony trabeculae are surrounded with osteoblasts and osteocytes (Fig. 4B). The interlacing fibrous tissue between the bony trabeculae showed dilated blood vessels (Fig. 4C). Using special histochemical staining of the neoplastic tissue (MT stain), it was clear that the neoplastic tissue wasS formed of both old bones, which stained red, and new bone stained blue. Also, the formed trabeculae were intermingled with prominent proliferation of fibroblasts tissue with a positive reaction as collagen fibers (Fig. 4D). The proliferated fibroblasts appeared regularly arranged, edematous, with a whirling appearance and without criteria of malignancy (Fig. 4E). The characteristic positive blue color histochemical staining of the neoplastic fibrous tissue using MT stain for demonstration of fibrous connective tissues and collagen is demonstrated in Fig. 4F.

D:Not copiedResearch and projecsشغل د. مصطفى أخر كلامأبحاث الأورامأبحاث منتهيهFibroma and Fibroosteomaالبحث نهائى بعد ضم كل الأنواعSubmission to JournalsSubmission to EAFP. Major revisionAuthor reply on reviewer commentscorrected photosP4.jpg
Figure 4.Histopathological micrographs of fibro-osteoma in Bartail flathead showing (A): Mixed neoplastic tissues formed of bony trabeculae (b) and prominent fibrous tissue (f) indicating fibro- osteoma. (B): The bony trabeculae surrounded with osteoblast and osteocytes (o). (C): The interlacing fibrous tissue (f) between the bony trabeculae (b) showed dilated blood vessels (bv). (D): Special histochemical staining of the neoplastic bony tissue formed of both old bones (ob), stained red and new bone (nb), stained blue with prominent fibrous tissue (f) formation. (E): The formed fibrous tissue (f) appeared regularly arranged, with whirling appearance and without criteria of malignancy, but with peripheral edema (arrow). (F): Special histochemical staining of the neoplastic fibrous tissue (f) appeared with the characteristic blue colour. (A-D&E: H&E stain; D&F: MT stain)

Discussion

Teleost’s marine fishes resemble other vertebrates in their basic susceptibility to developing neoplastic lesions. The present study revealed proliferative dermal lesions in four commercial marine fish species caught from the water of the Arabian Gulf. Our results were in harmony with the findings reported by Sindermann (1979), Overstreet (1988), Grosset, ME, and Groff (2016), Kamalesh, Chandy, and Bedre (2021), and Mariasingrayan, Danaraj, Dinh-Hung, et al. (2024), where the neoplastic overgrowth, fibromas, was recorded in many fish species at different sites in the affected fishes. The gross description of the neoplastic overgrowth in fish is varied and related to the stage of tumorigenesis and affected fish species (Anekhy and Mehana 2022). In fibroma, the cellular and collagen fibers’ contents are the most crucial factor for the texture of this tumor and indicate whether it is soft, with more cellular contents, or hard made up of numerous fibers and a small number of cells (John, Chirayath, and Paulson 2015). On the other side, dilated lymph and blood vessels associated with edema were recorded in solitary fibrous tumors (Davanzo et al. 2018).

In Bartail flathead, a more complicated neoplastic lesion was noticed on the dorsal fin, an osteo-fibromas. The tumor in this fish was rounded, hard in consistency, and firmly attached to the spines of the dorsal fin. In histopathological sections, the neoplastic mass was formed of both proliferated fibroblasts and osteoblasts forming interlacing bony trabeculae. The proliferated bone showed variable degrees of maturation when stained by MT stain. In this regard, the characteristic feature of the neoplastic cells is their rapid and new proliferation. MT stain is used to differentiate the old and newly formed bone (Lim, Lee, Yun, et al. 2013). However, the newly formed bone in the bony trabeculae could be an indication of active proliferation of the osteoblasts in the neoplastic tissue. On the other hand, it could be part of the dorsal fin bone that is undergoing remodeling in response to the presence of the tumor. The fact that there is a combination of both old and new bone does not necessarily indicate that the tumor is the source of the bone. To the best of our knowledge, the records of the mixed tumor, fibro-osteoma in marine fishes are scarce. In our study, it is worth mentioning that the observed neoplasms, fibromas and osteo-fibroma were observed in the tissues near the bony structure (lower jaw and fins). In this regard, the origin of fibroma was in question, and many ancient theories supposed the origin of fibroma, among which was the possibility of its origin from periosteum (Maurice and Milad 1981). The etiological agents of fibromas in teleosts are multifactorial, including congenital malformation, repeated physical trauma, radiation, and environmental pollution (Black et al. 1982; Annahita, Zahra, and Rahim 2017; Meyers et al. 2019), some extent some viruses, especially retroviruses (Francis-Floyd et al. 1993; Coffee, Casey, and Bowser 2013). However, the fibromas caused by viruses usually have a characteristic tissue reaction and appear as multifocal lesions at different sites of the fish body, associated with lymphocytes’ aggregation and vacuolated cytoplasm of the neoplastic cells (Anders, Hilger, and Moller 1991); thus, the possibility of viral etiology is considered unlikely.

In this study, the potential chemical contamination as well as manmade pollutants that might be discharged to the water of the Arabian Gulf at the El-Jubial region could be expected to be considered in the etiology of the neoplasms in these fish species, which is supported by Oishi, Yamazaki, and Harada 1976; Sindermann 1976; Watermann, Dethlefsen, and Happenheit 1982 and Anders, Hilger, and Moller 1991. Hashim, AL-Hussaini, and Al-Baz 1994, confirmed that some fish species caught from the water of the Arabian Gulf are affected by oil pollution in this region. Predisposing factors such as carcinogenic compounds, viruses, irritants, oncogenes, and parasites have all been reported in teleosts and should be considered as potential sources for tumor induction in the tropical fish (Stoskopf 1993). As the etiology and significance of fibroma in other commercial marine fish at El-Jubial are not well documented, further research is needed to evaluate the potential role of the environmental pollution in this location on the occurrence of the neoplasms in this fish species.


Acknowledgment

Our grateful appreciation and thanks to Mr. S.I. Al-Fayadh, Deputy Minister for Fisheries affairs, Ministry of Agriculture, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, for facilitating the research work during this study. Great thanks to A. El-Zaharani, Ministry of Environment, Water, and Agriculture, Fish Welfare Branch, El-Jubail Province, Saudi Arabia, for his support and encouragement.

Author Contributions

MAM and MMI developed the research concept. This study was conducted in cooperation between all authors; MAM and MMI conceived and designed the study. MMI performed fish sampling and gross fish examination and identification of fish species. MAM, MMI, F.A.A., and A.A. shared in gross and histopathological examination of the fish neoplasms. All authors wrote, drafted, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance and ethical standards

All authors declare that the finding in this study was conducted on fish in markets. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Submitted: February 14, 2025 CEST

Accepted: June 05, 2025 CEST

References

Anders, K., I. Hilger, and H. Moller. 1991. “Lentivius Prticles in Cnnective Tumors of Fish from German Coastal Waters.” Dis. Of Aquat. Org. 11:151–54.
Google Scholar
Anekhy, M., and E. E. Mehana. 2022. “Tumorigenesis and Tumor Markers in Fish: An Updated Review.” Bionature 42 (2): 36–55. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.56557/​bn/​2022/​v42i21730.
Google Scholar
Annahita, R., T. D. Zahra, and P. Rahim. 2017. “Fibrosarcoma in a Goldfish (Carassius Auratus): A Case Report.” The Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 9:45–48.
Google Scholar
Baba, A. I., and C. Catoi. 2007. “Chapter 3. Tumor Cell Morphology.” In Comparative Oncology, edited by R. O. Buchares. Bucharest: The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy. https:/​/​www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​books/​NBK9553/​.
Google Scholar
Black, J. J., E. D. Evans, J. C. Harshbarger, and R. F. Zeigel. 1982. “Epizootic Neoplasms in Fishes from a Lake Polluted by Copper Mining Wastes.” J Natl Cancer Inst 69 (4): 915–26.
Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., S. R. Amend, R. H. Austin, R. A. Gatenby, E. U. Hammarlund, and K. J. Pienta. 2023. “Updating the Definition of Cancer.” Mol Cancer Res 21 (11): 1142–47. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1158/​1541-7786.MCR-23-0411.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Carpenter, K. E., F. Krupp, D. A. Jones, and U. Zajonz. 1997. FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. The Living Marine Resources of Kuwait, Eastern Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Rome: FAO.
Google Scholar
Coffee, L. L., J. W. Casey, and P. R. Bowser. 2013. “Pathology of Tumors in Fish Associated With Retroviruses: A Review.” Veterinary Pathology 50 (3): 390–403. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1177/​0300985813480529.
Google Scholar
Davanzo, B., R. E. Emerson, M. Lisy, L. G. Koniaris, and J. K. Kays. 2018. “Solitary Fibrous Tumor.” Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 21 (3): 94. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.21037/​tgh.2018.11.02.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Fournie, J. W., and W. K. Vogelbein. 1994. “Exocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms in the Mummichog (Fundulus Heteroclitus) from a Creosote – Contaminated Site.” Toxicologic Pathology 22 (3): 237–47.
Google Scholar
Francis-Floyd, R., B. Bolon, W. Fraser, and P. Reed. 1993. “Lip Fibromas Associated with Retrovirus-like Particles in Angel Fish.” J Am Vet Med Assoc 202 (3): 427–29. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.2460/​javma.1993.202.03.427.
Google Scholar
Gomes, C. C. 2022. “Recurrent Driver Mutations in Benign Tumors.” Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 789:108412.
Google Scholar
Grizzle, J. M., and E. H. Williams. 1983. “Dermal Fibroma in a Redband Parrotfish, Sparisoma Aurofrenatum (Valenciennes).” Journal of Fish Diseases 6 (2): 205–9. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1365-2761.1983.tb00069.x.
Google Scholar
Groff, J. M. 2004. “Neoplasia in Fishes.” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 7 (3): 705–56.
Google Scholar
Grosset, Claire, Nadeau ME, and Joseph Groff. 2016. “Fish Oncology : Diseases, Diagnostics and Therapeutics.” Veterinary Clinics of North America Exotic Animal Practice 20:21–56.
Google Scholar
Handharyani, E., H. Hatai, A. Winarto, and K. Ochiat. 2008. “Dermal Fibroma in a Goldfish : Immunohistochemistry and Polymerase Chain Reaction.” Bogoc, Indonesia, August 19"- 2Z".
Google Scholar
Hashim, O., M. AL-Hussaini, and Ali Al-Baz. 1994. “Signs of Oil Pollution on Fishes in The Arabian Gulf.” Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Marine Sciences 6. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.4197/​mar.6-1.7.
Google Scholar
Jawad, L. A., and M. Ibrahim. 2021. “Characterization and Possible Cause of the Fish Anomalies So Far Reported in the Vicinity of Jubail City, Saudi Arabia, Arabian Gulf.” In The Arabian Seas: Biodiversity, Environmental Challenges and Conservation Measures, edited by L. A. Jawad. Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar
John, M., S. Chirayath, and S. Paulson. 2015. “Soft Fibromas of the Lid.” Indian J Ophthalmol 63 (3): 262–64. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.4103/​0301-4738.156932.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Kamalesh, K. S., George Chandy, and M. Bedre. 2021. “Surgical Removal of Fibroma in a Gold Fish Using Clove Oil as Anesthetic” 22:250–53.
Google Scholar
kreyberg, leiv. 1937. “An Intra-Abdominal Fibroma in a Brown Trout.” The American Journal of Cancer 30 (1): 112–14. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1158/​ajc.1937.112.
Google Scholar
Lim, J., J. Lee, H. S. Yun, et al. 2013. “Comparison of Bone Regeneration Rate in Flat and Long Bone Defects: Calvarial and Tibial Bone.” Tissue Eng Regen Med 10:336–40. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s13770-013-1094-9.
Google Scholar
Luna, L. G. 1968. Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 3rd ed. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Mariasingrayan, Y., J. Danaraj, N. Dinh-Hung, et al. 2024. “Cutaneous Fibroma in Largescale Mullet, Planiliza Macrolepis (Smith, 1846) from Rameswaram Island, Southeast India.” Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 47:621–24.
Google Scholar
Maurice, M., and M. Milad. 1981. “Pathogenesis of Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Fibroma: A New Concept.” The Journal of Laryngology & Otolog 95 (11): 1121–26. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1017/​S0022215100091891.
Google Scholar
Meyers, Theodore, Tamara Burton, Collette Bentz, Jayde Ferguson, Davis Stewart, and Norman Starkey. 2019. Diseases of Wild and Cultured Fishes in Alaska. 3rd ed.
Google Scholar
Morado, C. N., F. G. Araújo, and I. D. Gomes. 2017. “The Use of Biomarkers for Assessing Effects of Pollutant Stress on Fish Species from a Tropical River in Southeastern Brazil.” Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences 39 (4): 431–39. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.4025/​actascibiolsci.v39i4.34293.
Google Scholar
Nottle, B. F., D. M. Tatarniuk, F. J. Caldwell, C. D. Bell, S. S. Caston, P. T. Merkatoris, A. M. Gillen, and S. A. Katzman. 2021. “Fibro-Osseous Lesions Of The Craniofacial Complex In Horses: 30 Cases (2001-2019).” Vet Surg 50 (2): 383–92. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​vsu.13559.
Google Scholar
Oishi, K., F. Yamazaki, and T. Harada. 1976. “Epidermal Papillomas of Flatfish in the Costal Water of Japan Hokkaido.” J. Fish Res. Broad Can. 33:2011–17.
Google Scholar
Overstreet, R. M. 1988. “Aquatic Pollution Problems ,Southeastern U.S. Coast : Histopathological Indicators.” Aquat. Toxicol. 11:213–39.
Google Scholar
Pillai, C. T., and D. Thampy. 1990. “Occurrence of Fibroma in a Major Carp, Labeo Rohita.” Indian Journal of Fisheries 37:77–78.
Google Scholar
Razmyar, Jamshid et al. 2008. “Ossifying Fibroma in a Canary (Serinus Canaria).” Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 22 (4): 320–22. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1647/​2007-027.1.
Google Scholar
Shalizar-Jalali, A., M. Behfar, S. Mahmoudi, A. Morvaridi, A. A. Tehrani, and F. Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei. 2020. “Occurrence of Fibroma in White Skirt Tetra (Gymnocorymbus Ternetzi): A Case Study with Literature Review.” SF Vet Sci Pet Care 1 (1): 1002.
Google Scholar
Shokrpoor, S., F. Sasani, H. Rahmati-Holasoo, and A. Zargar. 2016. “Concurrence of a Fibroma and Myxoma in an Oranda Goldfish (Carassius Auratus).” Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol. 36 (6): 263–68.
Google Scholar
Sindermann, C. J. 1976. “Effects of Costal Pollution on Fish and Fisheries with Particular References to the Middle Atlantic Bight.” Am.Soc.Limnol.Oceanagr Spec.Symp, 281–301.
Google Scholar
———. 1979. “Pollution Associated Diseases and Abnormalties of Fish and Shellfish: Areview.” Fish Bull 16:717–41.
Google Scholar
———. 1990. Principal Diseases of Marine Fish and Shellfish. San Diego , California 92101: Academic press , Tnc.
Google Scholar
Soltero-Rivera, M., J. B. Engiles, A. M. Reiter, J. Reetz, J. R. Lewis, and M. D. Sánchez. 2015. “Benign and Malignant Proliferative Fibro-Osseous and Osseous Lesions of the Oral Cavity of Dogs.” Vet Pathol 52 (5): 894–902. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1177/​0300985815583096.
Google Scholar
Stich, H. F., A. B. Acton, K. Oishi, F. Yamazaki, T. Harada, T. Hibini, and H. G. Moser. 1977. “Systemic Collaborative Studies on Neoplasms in Marine Animals as Related to the Environment.” Ann N.Y. Acad.Sci. 298:374–88. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1749-6632.1977.tb19279.x.
Google Scholar
Stoskopf, M. K. 1993. Fish Medicine. Mexico city, Mexico: W. B. Saunders.
Google Scholar
Watermann, B., V. Dethlefsen, and M. Happenheit. 1982. “Epidermology of Psedobranchial Tumors in Atlantic Cod ( Gadus Morhua) from the North Sea and Baltic Sea Helgo- Lander Wis.” Meerunters 35:425–37. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF01999133.
Google Scholar

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system