Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
null
Bulletin of the EAFP
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Case study
    • Expert Opinion
    • Method
    • Note
    • Research article
    • Review
    • Workshop Report
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:29226/feed
Research article
Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2022October 05, 2022 CEST

Molecular characterisation of Lymphocystis Disease Virus detected from Sea Bream in Turkey

K. Pekmez, M. Kaplan, A.A. Çağırgan, F. Arslan, B. Kafa, G. Kalaycı,
Lymphocystis Disease VirusSea BreamLCDVphylogeneticTurkey
Copyright Logoccby-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.48045/001c.38086
Photo by Sebastian Pena Lambarri on Unsplash
Bulletin of the EAFP
Pekmez, K., M. Kaplan, A.A. Çağırgan, F. Arslan, B. Kafa, and G. Kalaycı. 2022. “Molecular Characterisation of Lymphocystis Disease Virus Detected from Sea Bream in Turkey.” Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 42 (2): 46–58. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48045/​001c.38086.
Save article as...▾
Download all (5)
  • Figure 1. Images of symptomatic fish.
    Download
  • Figure 2. Amplification, melting curve and melting peaks of qPCR.
    Download
  • Figure 3a. ML phylogenetic tree based on the partial nucleotide sequences of the MCP gene of all genotypes.
    Download
  • Figure 3b. ML phylogenetic tree based on the partial nucleotide sequences of the MCP gene of genotype VII.
    Download
  • Figure 3c. ML phylogenetic tree based on the partial aa sequences of the MCP gene of all genotypes.
    Download

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

If this problem reoccurs, please contact Scholastica Support

Error message:

undefined

View more stats

Abstract

Lymphocystis disease is a common, chronic and benign infection of fish. The disease has a worldwide distribution and has been reported from more than 125 marine and freshwater sites. In this study, molecular diagnosis and characterisation of Lymphocystis Disease Virus were performed from samples collected from sea bream fry showing lymphocystis disease symptoms in a farm located in the Aegean Sea. As a result of the phylogenetic analysis, the virus was classified as genotype VII. According to the similarity of nucleotide sequence, SA1.ETun.2011 virus reported from Tunisia was the closest related virus. The rate of amino acid substitution between genotypes was quite high, while amongst the genotype VII isolates substitution rates were low. When the similarity between the genotypes was investigated using the nucleotide sequences, the closest and most distant genotypes to the genotype VII were V and I, respectively.

Introduction

Lymphocystis disease is a common, chronic and benign infection that results in hypertrophy of fibroblastic cells in the dermis connective tissue (Samalecos 1986). The disease was characterised by nodules usually occurring on the skin and fins, as well as sometimes in internal organs and gills (Anders 1989). The disease has a worldwide distribution and has been reported from more than 125 marine and freshwater fish species (Borrego et al. 2015).

The causative agent of the disease is the lymphocystis disease virus (LCDV) (Wolf 1988). While detectability of the virus in untreated seawater takes 7-15 days depending on the water temperature, this period can be up to 240 days dependent on the water temperature, water quality and the treatment performed (Leiva-Rebollo et al. 2021). Viral transmission is horizontally caused by direct contact and via water. In addition, physical traumas on the skin facilitate transmission (Wolf 1988). It is also thought that the virus can be transmitted by feeding (Cano et al. 2012; Valverde et al. 2019). Vertical transmission is thought to be via viruses on the surface of untreated eggs (Cano et al. 2012).

LCDV has icosahedral symmetrical morphology with virions measuring 150-350 nm diameter containing a double-stranded linear DNA genome (Berthiaume, Alain, and Robin 1984; Jancovich et al. 2012). LDCV is a member of the Lymphocystivirus genus of the Iridoviridae family (Jancovich et al. 2012). The Lymphocystivirus genus contains four species named LCDV 1, 2 (c), 3 (SA) and 4 (WC): they were isolated from European flounder, Japanese flounder, gilthead seabream and whitemouth croaker, respectively (ICVT, 2020). Moreover, these species have different genome sizes of 102,653, 186,250, 208,501, and 211,086 bp, respectively (Tidona and Darai 1997; Zhang et al. 2004; López-Bueno et al. 2016; Doszpoly et al. 2020).

The major capsid protein (MCP) gene, which is a relatively conserved region in iridoviruses, was reported to be a suitable target for phylogenetic studies (Tidona et al. 1998). In the phylogenetic analysis of LCDV with the MCP gene as a target, LCDV isolates reported from 11 different species were divided into nine genotypes (Palmer, Hogan, and van den Heuvel 2012). According to this classification: LCDV-1 European flounder isolate is assigned as genotype I; genotype II includes Japanese flounder (LCDV-C) isolates; genotype III includes black rockfish (LCDV-RF) isolates; genotype IV consists of cobia and Japanese sea bass (LCDV-RC and LCDV-SB, respectively) isolates; genotype V includes painted glassfish (LCDV-CB) isolates; genotype VI for gourami; genotype VII consist of gilthead sea bream and Senegalese sole (LCDV-SA and LCDV-SSE, respectively) isolates; genotype VIII includes a largemouth bass isolate; and genotype IX is assigned for an American yellow perch isolate.

Although the first reports of LCDV date back more than 100 years, there has been little genetic data on the virus until the last few decades. Whereas the disease was previously reported from Turkey in different years (1991, 1992, 2014 and 2015), there is limited molecular characterisation of Turkish isolates (Candan 1991; Moate, Harris, and McMohan 1992; López-Bueno et al. 2016; Labella et al. 2019).

This study aimed to perform LCDV molecular detection and molecular characterisation from samples of juvenile sea bream showing lymphocystis disease symptoms collected from a sea bream farm located in the Aegean Sea.

Materials and methods

Samples and sample preparation

Thirty fish samples collected from a cage of fish displaying lymphocystis symptoms were divided into three groups with 10 fish each. Images of symptomatic fish are presented in Figure 1. Only nodules were taken from the first group and internal organs (heart, kidney, spleen, liver, digestive system) were taken from the other two groups, so three pools were created. L-15 medium with 15% FBS and antibiotic antimycotic solution (300 IU/mLpenicillin, 30 μg/mL streptomycin and 0.075 mg/mLamphotericin B.) were added at a ratio of 1:10 to pooled tissue samples and homogenised using a homogeniser (Allsheng/BIOPREP-24). Homogenates were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and then supernatant was collected and passed through a 0.45 µM membrane filter. Finally, filtered supernatants were stored at -80°C until nucleic acid isolation.

Figure 1
Figure 1.Images of symptomatic fish.

The photographs were taken using a trinocular stereo microscope (Olympos-SZX7).

Nucleic acid isolation and qPCR

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the total nucleic acid isolation was performed using Roche MagNA Pure LC and MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit.

qPCR was performed using the FastStart Essential DNA Green Master kit (Roche, Germany) and a previously described primer set (Ciulli et al. 2015), LCDV qPCR F1 and LCDV qPCR R3. The reaction mixture was 20 μL total reaction volume and consisted of 10 μL Mastermix, 5 μL RNA template, 3 μL H2O and 1 μL (10 μM) of each primer.

The thermal profile used for qPCR was 95°C for 10 min, followed by 42 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 50°C for 10 s and 72°C for 20 s. After the run, the melting curve (60-95°C) of each amplicon was examined to determine the specificity of the amplification.

Conventional PCR and sequence analysis

The PCR assay was conducted using LC1-F, LC1-R primer sets, as previously described (Kitamura et al. 2006) targeting MCP gene and the Xpert Fast Hotstart Mastermix with Dye kit (GRIPS, Portugal) according to the following program 95°C for 15 min; 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 55°C for 15 s and 72°C for 15 s; and then 72°C for three min. Products were then subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%) in TAE buffer and visualised under UV light.

Sequence analysis was performed in two directions by a commercial company (Microsynth, Switzerland). Data obtained from sequence analysis were assembled and edited using DNADynamo software.

Alignment and phylogenetic analysis

Sequences obtained in the study were downloaded from the gene bank (sequences selected from the gene bank were those whose length was equal to the sequence obtained in this study and longer ones were preferred). They were aligned by the Clustal W method using MEGA X software (Kumar et al. 2018).

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic trees and distances between nucleotide sequences were inferred using Tamura 3- parameter model + gamma distribution (T92+G) with 1000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA X software (Tamura 1992; Kumar et al. 2018). Amino acid distances were calculated using the Jones-Taylor-Thornton model + gamma distribution (JTT+G) by MEGA-X software (Jones et al., 1992; Kumar et al. 2018).

Results

As a result of qPCR, amplification was observed in all samples and the specificity of the amplification was confirmed by melting curve analysis. Amplification, melting curve and melting peaks are presented in Figure 2. Since the studied three sample pools were collected from the same cage, sequencing was carried out with one of the three obtained sequences. The detected virus was named TR LCDV BVKE 11.09.21.

Figure 2
Figure 2.Amplification, melting curve and melting peaks of qPCR.

The PCR products of the partial MCP genes were detected as a 1356 base pair amplicon on the 1.5% agarose gel. As a result of editing and assembling the raw data sequence, a consensus sequence of 1263 bp was obtained. This partial sequence corresponds to 65000-66263 nucleotide genomic region of the complete genome of reference LCDV-3 virus SA9 (accession no: KX643370). This region contains between 20 and 440 amino acids of the MCP gene. The newly generated sequence has been deposited into Genbank under the accession number OM160647. All molecular studies were performed using this region.

Detected virus, TR LCDV BVKE 11.09.21, was taxonomically grouped as genotype VII. Genotype VII was divided into three subtypes in the ML phylogenetic trees using nt sequences. Turkey, Israel, France and Tunisia viruses were grouped into subtype I while Spain viruses in subtype II and Portugal viruses in subtype III. The reconstructed ML phylogenetic trees are shown in Figures 3a, 3b and 3c.

Figure 3a
Figure 3a.ML phylogenetic tree based on the partial nucleotide sequences of the MCP gene of all genotypes.

The numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values (only values > 70% are reported).

Figure 3b
Figure 3b.ML phylogenetic tree based on the partial nucleotide sequences of the MCP gene of genotype VII.

The numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values (only values > 70% are reported).

Figure 3c
Figure 3c.ML phylogenetic tree based on the partial aa sequences of the MCP gene of all genotypes.

The numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values (only values > 70% are reported).

The nt and aa sequence distances of TR LCDV BVKE 11.09.21 to other viruses vary between 0.16-33.43% and 0.0001-15.5%, respectively. According to the nt sequence, SA1.ETun.2011 (HE650105) reported from Tunisia was the closest, and LCDV 1 (L63545) was the most distant to TR LCDV BVKE 11.09.21. In terms of aa, SA5, SA9 and SA19 from Spain, SA1.ETun.2011 from Tunisia and SA18 from Portugal were determined as closest to TR LCDV BVKE 11.09.21, while LCDV-1 was determined as the most dissimilar. When distances between the genotypes according to the nucleotide sequences were investigated, it was determined that the closest was Genotype V with 85.8% similarity and the most distant genotype, genotype I, with 66.6% similarity. The distances between genotypes are given in Table 1.

Table 1.Distances between genotypes.
Genotype VII V X IV II IX VIII III VI
VII
V 0,142
X 0,199 0,199
IV 0,181 0,159 0,191
II 0,211 0,181 0,192 0,128
IX 0,229 0,241 0,280 0,215 0,259
VIII 0,209 0,216 0,231 0,202 0,230 0,153
III 0,225 0,205 0,235 0,192 0,193 0,229 0,194
VI 0,237 0,226 0,282 0,213 0,211 0,204 0,170 0,175
I 0,334 0,323 0,337 0,302 0,314 0,279 0,278 0,272 0,274

Amino acids substitutions of between 20 and 440 of the MCP gene aa sequence were investigated using LCDV-1 (accession number: L63545) as reference. As a result of the alignment of our sequence with the reference showed that 34 aa substitutions occurred in the partial aa sequences of the MCP gene. In all sequences there were fourteen identical aa substitutions. These fourteen aa substitutions and their localisations are shown in Table 2. Among the aa sequences of viruses classified in genotype VII, 14 substitutions were observed.

Table 2.The observed fourteen aa substitutions and their localisations.
No aa position in the MCP gene aa in LCDV-1 Others isolates
1 88 S A
2 99 N A
3 136 Y F
4 151 N D
5 161 I T
6 218 H N
7 222 C S
8 227 I L
9 249 A V
10 307 T V
11 310 A Q
12 334 L G
13 335 V I
14 418 N T

Discussion

Although sea bream production in the Mediterranean basin is a relatively young industry, it has grown and developed since the 80s and 90% of the production is carried out by six countries, including Turkey (Muniesa et al. 2020). Sea bream production in Turkey ranks 3rd in total fish production, following sea bass and rainbow trout, with 110 thousand tons, according to 2020 data (TURKSTAT 2021). The Aegean Sea is the region where sea bream production is most intense in Turkey. In this study, molecular detection and characterisation of LCDV were carried out in a sea bream farm located in the Aegean Sea.

Although the mortality rate of the disease is generally low, it has been reported that in some species (Japanese flounder, red sea bream and cobia), that the mortality rate can reach 30%, and significant deaths are experienced in juvenile sea bream (Kvitt, Heinisch, and Diamant 2008; Zhan et al. 2010). In addition to high mortality rates, the inability to commercialise symptomatic fish causes economic losses (Masoero et al. 1986). The fact that the mortality rate was 20% higher than previous years in the farm where the sampling was undertaken also supports these data, and overlaps with these data with regards to LCDV causing mortality. While the signs of the disease usually occur on the skin, tail and fins, sometimes lesions can also be seen in the internal organs and it has also been reported that the virus has a wide tissue tropism in studies with asymptomatic and recovered fish (Anders 1989; Valverde et al. 2017). Although no macroscopic lesions were observed in the internal organs of fish, the virus was detected in sample pools obtained from the internal organs.

According to the phylogenetic classification studies performed targeting the major capsid protein gene, which is a relatively conserved region of iridoviruses, nine genotypes of LCDV have been described (Tidona et al. 1998; Palmer, Hogan, and van den Heuvel 2012). The LCDV-WC which was reported as the 4th species of the Lymphocystivirus by Perretta et al. (2020), exhibits a separate phylogenetic branching from the other viruses in the ML phylogenetic tree, and thus was subsequently named genotype X in this study.

In the phylogenetic tree reconstructed using nucleotide sequences, genotype VII was divided into three main branches; the first branch consisted of Israel, France, Turkey and Tunisia viruses, the second one contained only Spanish viruses and the third one which is rooted in a common node with the second, contained a Portuguese isolate. According to this branching, we suggest that this grouping reflects the geographical distribution. However, this distinction was not observed in the phylogenetic tree constructed using amino acid sequences. Moreover, when aa and nt sequences distance results were compared, a discrepancy was observed between the results. For example, the Portugal viruses (GU320734), which was the most distant to TR LCDV BVKE 11.09.21 according to the nt similarity, was amongst the most similar in terms of aa sequences. This situation reveals the necessity of investigating the molecular evolution of the virus and its circulation in the Mediterranean region, as well as investigating whether phylogenetic analyses targeting other gene regions can provide a consistent distinction between isolates.

MCP, which constitutes a large part of the virus, has been used as a target protein for creating new generation vaccines (Zheng et al. 2006; Tian et al. 2008; Zheng et al. 2010; Leiva-Rebollo et al. 2021). It was reported in these studies that DNA vaccines provide protection in related fish species. However, no study has been conducted on whether these vaccines confer cross-protection between genotypes or not. When investigating the aa sequence of the MCP, a high number of aa mutations are noted. This result suggests that cross-protection between genotypes may be minimal, but wet-lab studies are needed to confirm this. Furthermore, even if aa substitution rates among viruses grouped in genotype VII is relatively low, the vaccine’s protection created using the MCP gene of LCDV-SA against other viruses classified in genotype VII should be investigated. To our knowledge, this study is the first study in which molecular characterisation of the LCDV has been performed in Turkey. In addition, it was determined that the MCP gene of LCDV reported from sea breams from the Mediterranean basin was relatively conserved. Further studies should be conducted to investigate whether mutations in the aa sequence cause a change in the antigenic structure of the protein.

Submitted: March 16, 2022 CEST

Accepted: July 07, 2022 CEST

References

Anders, K. 1989. “Lymphocystis Disease of Fishes.” In Viruses of Lower Vertebrates, edited by W. Ahne and E. Kurstak, 141–60. Springer. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-642-83727-2_14.
Google Scholar
Berthiaume, L., R. Alain, and J. Robin. 1984. “Morphology and Ultrastructure of Lymphocystis Disease Virus, a Fish Iridovirus, Grown in Tissue Culture.” Virology 135 (1): 10–19. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0042-6822(84)90112-0.
Google Scholar
Borrego, Juan J., Estefania J. Valverde, Alejandro M. Labella, and Dolores Castro. 2015. “Lymphocystis Disease Virus: Its Importance in Aquaculture.” Reviews in Aquaculture 9 (2): 179–93. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​raq.12131.
Google Scholar
Candan, A. 1991. “Lymphocystis Disease of Sparus aurata in Marine Culture at Aegean and Mediterranean Coast of Turkey.” 1991. https:/​/​www.fao.org/​3/​af035e/​AF035E04.htm#ch4.5.
Cano, I, E J Valverde, E Garcia-Rosado, M C Alonso, B Lopez-Jimena, J B Ortiz-Delgado, J J Borrego, C Sarasquete, and D Castro. 2012. “Transmission of Lymphocystis Disease Virus to Cultured Gilthead Seabream, Sparus Aurata L., Larvae.” Journal of Fish Diseases 36 (6): 569–76. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​jfd.12011.
Google Scholar
Ciulli, Sara, Ana Cristina de Aguiar Saldana Pinheiro, Enrico Volpe, Michele Moscato, Tae Sung Jung, Marco Galeotti, Sabrina Stellino, Riccardo Farneti, and Santino Prosperi. 2015. “Development and Application of a Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection and Quantitation of Lymphocystis Disease Virus.” Journal of Virological Methods 213 (March):164–73. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jviromet.2014.11.011.
Google Scholar
Doszpoly, Andor, Győző L. Kaján, Rodrigo Puentes, and Alejandro Perretta. 2020. “Complete Genome Sequence and Analysis of a Novel Lymphocystivirus Detected in Whitemouth Croaker (Micropogonias Furnieri): Lymphocystis Disease Virus 4.” Archives of Virology 165 (5): 1215–18. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00705-020-04570-1.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Jancovich, J.K., V.G. Chinchar, A. Hyatt, T. Miyazaki, Williams T, and Q.Y. Zhang. 2012. “Family Iridoviridae.” In “Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses,” edited by A.M.Q. King, M.J. Adams, E.B. Carstens, and E.J. Lefkowitz, 193–210. San Diego: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
Kitamura, S.I., S.J. Jung, W.S. Kim, T. Nishizawa, Yoshimuzu M, and M.J. Oh. 2006. “A New Genotype of Lymphocystivirus.” LCDV-RF, from Lymphocystis Diseased Rockfish. Archives of Virology 151:607–15.
Google Scholar
Kumar, Sudhir, Glen Stecher, Michael Li, Christina Knyaz, and Koichiro Tamura. 2018. “MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 35 (6): 1547–49. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1093/​molbev/​msy096.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Kvitt, Hagit, Gilad Heinisch, and Ariel Diamant. 2008. “Detection and Phylogeny of Lymphocystivirus in Sea Bream Sparus Aurata Based on the DNA Polymerase Gene and Major Capsid Protein Sequences.” Aquaculture 275 (1–4): 58–63. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aquaculture.2008.01.007.
Google Scholar
Labella, AM, R Leiva-Rebollo, A Alejo, D Castro, and JJ Borrego. 2019. “Lymphocystis Disease Virus (LCDV-Sa), Polyomavirus 1 (SaPyV1) and Papillomavirus 1 (SaPV1) in Samples of Mediterranean Gilthead Seabream.” Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 132 (2): 151–56. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3354/​dao03311.
Google Scholar
Leiva-Rebollo, Rocío, Dolores Castro, Patricia Moreno, Juan J. Borrego, and Alejandro M. Labella. 2021. “Evaluation of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Immune Response after LCDV-Sa DNA Vaccination.” Animals 11 (6): 1613. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3390/​ani11061613.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
López-Bueno, Alberto, Carla Mavian, Alejandro M. Labella, Dolores Castro, Juan J. Borrego, Antonio Alcami, and Alí Alejo. 2016. “Concurrence of Iridovirus, Polyomavirus, and a Unique Member of a New Group of Fish Papillomaviruses in Lymphocystis Disease-Affected Gilthead Sea Bream.” Journal of Virology 90 (19): 8768–79. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1128/​jvi.01369-16.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Masoero, L., C. Ercolini, Caggiano M, and A. Rossa. 1986. “Obsservazioni preliminari sulle linfocisti in una maricoltura intensiva italiana.” Rivista Italiana di Piscicoltura e Ittiopatologia 21:70–74.
Google Scholar
Moate, R.M., J.E. Harris, and S. McMohan. 1992. “Lymphocystis Infections in Cultured Gilt-Head Sea Bream (Sparus Aurata) in the Aegean Sea.” Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 12:134–36.
Google Scholar
Muniesa, Ana, Bernardo Basurco, Cristóbal Aguilera, Dolors Furones, Carmen Reverté, Anna Sanjuan-Vilaplana, Mona Dverdal Jansen, Edgar Brun, and Saraya Tavornpanich. 2020. “Mapping the Knowledge of the Main Diseases Affecting Sea Bass and Sea Bream in Mediterranean.” Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 67 (3): 1089–1100. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​tbed.13482.
Google Scholar
Palmer, L J, N S Hogan, and M R van den Heuvel. 2012. “Phylogenetic Analysis and Molecular Methods for the Detection of Lymphocystis Disease Virus from Yellow Perch, Perca Flavescens (Mitchell).” Journal of Fish Diseases 35 (9): 661–70. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1365-2761.2012.01391.x.
Google Scholar
Perretta, A, A Doszpoly, R Puentes, and M Bessonart. 2020. “Diagnosis of Lymphocystis Disease in a Novel Host, the Whitemouth Croaker Micropogonias Furnieri, Associated with a Putatively Novel Lymphocystivirus Species (LCDV-WC).” Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 137 (3): 185–93. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3354/​dao03438.
Google Scholar
Samalecos, C. P. 1986. “Analysis of the Structure of Fish Lymphocystis Disease Virions from Skin Tumours of Pleuronectes.” Archives of Virology 91 (1–2): 1–10. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​bf01316723.
Google Scholar
Tamura, K. 1992. “Estimation of the Number of Nucleotide Substitutions When There Are Strong Transition-Transversion and G + C-Content Biases.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 9:678–87.
Google Scholar
Tian, Jiyuan, Xiuqin Sun, Xiguang Chen, Juan Yu, Lingyun Qu, and Lingchong Wang. 2008. “The Formulation and Immunisation of Oral Poly(DL-Lactide-Co-Glycolide) Microcapsules Containing a Plasmid Vaccine against Lymphocystis Disease Virus in Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus).” International Immunopharmacology 8 (6): 900–908. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.intimp.2008.02.006.
Google Scholar
Tidona, Christian A., and Gholamreza Darai. 1997. “The Complete DNA Sequence of Lymphocystis Disease Virus.” Virology 230 (2): 207–16. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1006/​viro.1997.8456.
Google Scholar
Tidona, Christian A., Paul Schnitzler, Roland Kehm, and Gholamreza Darai. 1998. “Is the Major Capsid Protein of Iridoviruses a Suitable Target for the Study of Viral Evolution?” Virus Genes 16 (1): 59–66. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1023/​a:1007949710031.
Google Scholar
TURKSTAT (Turkish Statistical Institute). 2021. “Quantity of Fishery Products, 2019, 2020.” 2021. https:/​/​data.tuik.gov.tr/​Bulten/​Index?p=Su-Urunleri-2020-37252.
Valverde, Estefania J., Juan J. Borrego, M. Carmen Sarasquete, Juan B. Ortiz-Delgado, and Dolores Castro. 2017. “Target Organs for Lymphocystis Disease Virus Replication in Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata).” Veterinary Research 48 (1): 21. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1186/​s13567-017-0428-3.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Valverde, Estefania J., Alejandro M. Labella, Juan J. Borrego, and Dolores Castro. 2019. “Artemia Spp., a Susceptible Host and Vector for Lymphocystis Disease Virus.” Viruses 11 (6): 506. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3390/​v11060506.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Wolf, Ken. 1988. Fish Viruses and Fish Viral Diseases. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.7591/​9781501746383.
Google Scholar
Zhan, Wenbin, Yongqin Li, Xiuzhen Sheng, Jing Xing, and Xiaoqian Tang. 2010. “Detection of Lymphocystis Disease Virus in Japanese Flounder Paralichthys Olivaceus and Other Marine Teleosts from Northern China.” Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 28 (6): 1213–20. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00343-010-9934-0.
Google Scholar
Zhang, Qi-Ya, Feng Xiao, Jian Xie, Zheng-Qiu Li, and Jian-Fang Gui. 2004. “Complete Genome Sequence of Lymphocystis Disease Virus Isolated from China.” Journal of Virology 78 (13): 6982–94. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1128/​jvi.78.13.6982-6994.2004.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Zheng, Feng-Rong, Xiu Qin Sun, Ming Qing Xing, and Hongzhan Liu. 2010. “Immune Response of DNA Vaccine against Lymphocystis Disease Virus and Expression Analysis of Immune-Related Genes after Vaccination.” Aquaculture Research 41 (March):1444–51. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1365-2109.2009.02435.x.
Google Scholar
Zheng, Feng-Rong, Xiu-Qin Sun, Hong-Zhan Liu, and Jin-Xing Zhang. 2006. “Study on the Distribution and Expression of a DNA Vaccine against Lymphocystis Disease Virus in Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus).” Aquaculture 261 (4): 1128–34. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aquaculture.2006.05.020.
Google Scholar

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system