Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
null
Bulletin of the EAFP
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Case study
    • Expert Opinion
    • Method
    • Note
    • Research article
    • Review
    • Workshop Report
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:9521/feed
Research article
Vol. 42, Issue 1, 2022October 05, 2022 CEST

Acute lethal toxicity of dried garlic (Allium sativum) powder on orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) juveniles under static exposure

G. Erazo-Pagador, H.R. Dumaran-Paciente, B.J. Caloyloy,
Allium sativumbehavioral responsegrouperLC50
Copyright Logoccby-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.48045/001c.38092
Photo by Max Gotts on Unsplash
Bulletin of the EAFP
Erazo-Pagador, G., H.R. Dumaran-Paciente, and B.J. Caloyloy. 2022. “Acute Lethal Toxicity of Dried  Garlic (Allium Sativum) Powder on Orange-Spotted Grouper (Epinephelus Coioides) Juveniles under Static Exposure.” Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 42 (1): 28–38. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48045/​001c.38092.
Save article as...▾
Download all (2)
  • Figure 1. Cumulative mortality of E. coioides exposed to different concentrations (mg L-1) of garlic powder for various exposure time.
    Download
  • Figure 2. Linear relationship between mean probit mortality and log concentration of E. coioides exposed to various concentrations of A. sativum garlic powder for 96 h.
    Download

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

If this problem reoccurs, please contact Scholastica Support

Error message:

undefined

View more stats

Abstract

The present study was carried out to assess the toxic effect and determine the lethal concentration of dried garlic (Allium sativum) powder on the orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) juveniles. Laboratory static bioassays were conducted to determine the 96-h LC50 of different concentrations of garlic (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 mg L-1) on grouper juveniles (mean weight, 35.4±6.18 g and mean length, 13.2±0.51 cm). The 96-h LC50 was 74.78 mg L-1 with lower and upper confidence limits of 62.8 and 89.06 mg L-1, respectively. All fish exposed to 30 to 180 mg L-1 exhibited rapid movement, faster opercular activity and erratic swimming whereas at higher concentrations (90 mg L-1 to 180 mg L-1) fish showed additional behavioral changes such as loss of balance, lethargy, gulping for air and respiratory distress. Water quality parameters were within the recommended acceptable limits. This LC50 value can be used as a baseline reference to generate an effective concentration of garlic for future prophylaxis and treatment for parasitic, viral and bacterial infection in grouper.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture is one of the most rapidly expanding animal culture systems and food-producing sectors, with total world fish production of 179 MT in 2018 (FAO, 2020). However, the intensification of the aquaculture industry has been associated with the increased occurrence of different fish diseases. Disease outbreaks continue to be a major constraint in aquaculture production as they can cause considerable economic losses in the industry (Foysal et al. 2019). Although effective therapeutants are available against diseases, these are primarily based on chemicals that are toxic to the environment and the host species (Palma, Cruz-Lacierda, and Corre 2015). Thus, there is a need for alternative treatments that are safe and environmentally friendly.

The utilisation of traditional plant-based medicine is an excellent alternative to manage aquatic animal diseases (Reverter et al. 2014; Valladão, Gallani, and Pilarski 2015; Van Hai 2015). One of these is garlic (A. sativum; Family Liliaceae) which is an edible plant and has strong prophylactic and therapeutic properties against bacteria (Feldberg et al. 1988; Ankri and Mirelman 1999; Corzo-Martinez, Corzo, and Villamiel 2007) and parasites (Rabinkov et al. 2000; Buchmann, Jensen, and Kruse 2003). It contains allicin, its major biologically active component (Lee and Gao 2012) and various compounds of amino acids that are highly unstable, volatile, cytotoxic, fat-soluble organosulfide compounds (Hussein, Hamdy, and Moussa 2013; Amagase et al. 2001). When garlic is crushed or chopped, the alliin (an amino acid derivative) interacts with the enzyme, alliinase to form allicin, giving the garlic its characteristics, odor and sulfur-containing compound. It was reported that garlic extract in bath treatment has anti-helminthic properties against Capillaria sp. in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) at 200 mg L-1 (Peña, Auró, and Sumano 1988), and inhibitory effects for fish parasite infestation against Ichthyopthirius multifiliis (Buchmann, Jensen, and Kruse 2003) in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) at 62.5 mg L-1 and Neobenedenia sp. (Militz et al. 2013) in farmed barramundi (Lates calcarifer) at 0.76 and 1.52 µL L-1. It has also an antibacterial activity against Aeromonas hydrophila in rohu (Labeo rohita) when incorporated in feeds at 1 g kg-1 (Sahu et al. 2007) and in Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) (Aly and Mohamed 2010) at 30 g kg-1 and in Thai silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus) at 8 mg mL-1 (Rahman et al. 2009).

The orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) is one of the most commercially and economically important species of marine fish cultured in Southeast Asia including the Philippines (Marte 2002). The high price and strong market demand for groupers have driven small-scale farming, providing a livelihood for fishermen in coastal communities in the region (Sadovy de Mitcheson et al. 2012; Amorim et al. 2019). Groupers are commonly cultured in floating net cages in marine and estuarine environments as well as in brackishwater earthen ponds. Like other species farmed in these systems, grouper production has been hampered by disease outbreaks due to bacterial, parasitic or fungal infections that often lead to mass mortalities (Sadovy 2020).

A number of studies have shown the potential use of garlic in aquaculture, however, only a few studies have investigated its potential for controlling diseases on groupers. As a basis for optimum therapeutic application, determining the toxicity and lethal concentrations of garlic powder on grouper is necessary. Thus, the objectives of the present study are to determine the 96-h median lethal concentration (LC50) of garlic and the behavioral response of juvenile groupers (E. coioides).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental set-up

Healthy hatchery-reared juvenile groupers (mean weight, 35.4±6.18 g and mean length, 13.2±0.51 cm) were purchased from a commercial hatchery at Sarangani, Philippines. The fish were acclimatised for at least 2 weeks under laboratory conditions (salinity = 33 ppt, temperature = 28°C). Fish were placed in a 500-L fiberglass tank provided with a flow-through seawater system and aeration. Fish were fed daily at 3% body weight with formulated feeds (SEAFDEC/AQD grouper diet) until use for the experiment.

2.2. Preparation of garlic solution

Garlic powder containing 25% allicin was obtained from Hebei Kangdali Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Garlic aqueous stock solution at 9,000 mg L-1 was prepared by adding 9 g powdered garlic in 1 L distilled water and stored in a dark bottle at room temperature.

2.3. Determination of median lethal garlic powder concentration (LC50) experiment

Two trials of 96 h static bioassay tests were conducted at the Fish Health Wet Laboratory of SEAFDEC/AQD following standard procedures for toxicity tests outlined by the APHA-AWWA-WEF (2012). The randomised design consisted of a control and six concentrations (30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 mg L-1) of garlic powder and were done in triplicates having ten fish per aquarium for a total of 30 fish and three tanks per test concentration. All fish were stocked in a 20-L glass aquarium filled with seawater and aeration was provided for 96 h. All the grouper juveniles were starved for 24 h, a day before the treatment and throughout the experiment. Mortality was recorded at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of exposure.

2.4. Water quality monitoring

At 24 h intervals, the water quality parameters, i.e. salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, were measured and recorded in all aquaria. Temperature and salinity were measured using a standard mercury thermometer and an AtagoS/Mill hand-held optical refractometer whereas dissolved oxygen and pH were measured using a digital Milwaukee MW 600 DO meter and Milwaukee MW 101 pH meter, respectively.

2.5. Behavioral patterns of fish

Fish were observed every 24 h for four days (96 h) for behavioral changes and mortality. No water change was done throughout the experiment. Fish was considered dead if the opercular and tail movements stopped and if there was no response to gentle prodding. Dead fish were removed immediately from the aquarium to avoid fouling, recorded and properly disposed.

2.6. Statistical analysis

The LC50 values were used to determine the acute toxicity effect using the Probit analysis program by Srinivasan (2004) based on Probit Analysis by Finney (1971).

3. Results

3.1. Toxicity of garlic to juvenile groupers

Figure 1 shows the cumulative mortality of grouper juveniles after they were exposed to different concentrations of garlic powder for 96 h. Results showed that the cumulative mortality for 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 mg L-1 were 0, 36.66, 60.00, 76.66, 93.33 and 100%, respectively. On the other hand, there was no mortality among the control group. However, 100% cumulative mortality was observed at the highest concentration tested. The median lethal (LC50) garlic powder concentrations were determined as 184.45, 121.42, 103.02 and 74.78 mg L-1 garlic powder at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of exposure, respectively. The 96-h LC50 of E. coioides exposed to various concentrations of garlic powder was 74.78 mg L-1 with lower and upper confidence limits of 62.80 and 89.06 mg L-1, respectively (Table 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1.Cumulative mortality of E. coioides exposed to different concentrations (mg L-1) of garlic powder for various exposure time.
Table 1.Lethal concentration (LC) values and confidence limits after 96 h exposure of E. coioides juveniles (BW=35.4±6.18 g; TL=13.2±0.51 cm) to garlic powder computed through Probit analysis.
Point Probit Concentration (ppm) Log Concentration 95% Confidence limits
Lower Upper
LC1 2.67 20.56 1.31 10.44 40.49
LC10 3.72 36.72 1.56 23.76 56.76
LC50 5.00 74.78 1.87 62.8 89.06
LC95 6.64 186.32 2.27 135.1 256.96
LC99 7.33 271.98 2.43 169.3 436.93

The regression equation was calculated to be Probit y = –13.131 + 9.1294 log Conc. X and on R square value (R2) of 0.93 (Figure 2). These expressions, that is, the regression equation R2 value indicated that the mortality rate of the test fish and concentrations of garlic powder are positively correlated. This means that the mortality rate of the fish increased with an increase in the concentration of garlic powder.

Figure 2
Figure 2.Linear relationship between mean probit mortality and log concentration of E. coioides exposed to various concentrations of A. sativum garlic powder for 96 h.

The mortality during 24, 48, 72 and 96 h exposure to garlic followed a concentration and time-dependent pattern where it increased at higher concentrations and longer exposure time (Figure 1). The garlic was found to be lethal on the second day of the experiment within 48 h at the highest concentrations of 180 mg L-1 wherein all fish were found to have died.

3.2. Water quality

Table 2 shows the mean values of water parameters of all test concentrations during the 96 h of the experiment. Temperature ranges from 37.4 to 37.8 °C, normal seawater salinity was maintained, DO levels were above 6 mg L-1 and pH slightly increased from 7.5 to 8.0 towards the last day of monitoring. The values of the water quality are within acceptable limits.

Table 2.Water parameter values (mean±SD) of all test concentrations during the 96 h exposure of E. coioides to powdered garlic (Hebei Kangdali Pharmaceutical C. Ltd., 25% allicin).
Time
(h)
Temperature
(0C)
Salinity
(ppt)
pH Dissolved oxygen
(ppm)
0 27.5±3.54 34.15±2.12 7.5±0.08 6.1±0.35
24 27.6±2.19 34.28±2.83 7.9±0.08 6.0±0.06
48 27.7±0.92 34.87±1.41 7.8±0.11 6.3±0.17
72 27.8±0.35 33.08±2.12 7.9±0.06 6.6±0.24
96 27.4±1.48 34.23±0.71 8.0±0.11 6.6±0.78

3.3. Behavioral response of groupers

The test fish exposed to different garlic concentrations during 96 h of exposure exhibited various behavioral patterns (Table 3). During the exposure time, fish at all tested concentrations showed rapid movement, faster opercular activity, erratic swimming behavior and fish settled down at the bottom of aquaria. It was observed that fish exposed to the highest concentrations (150 and 180 mg L-1) of garlic powder exhibited behavioral responses such as loss of balance, respiratory distress, lethargy and crowding on the water surface. However, these observations were minimal in the group exposed to 30-90 mg L-1 of the garlic powder whereas behavioral changes were not observed in the control group. All altered behaviors were observed only for the first 24 h and consequently, fish were either dead or recuperated.

Table 3.Behavioral changes of E. coioides exposed to various concentrations of A. sativum powder at 24 h.
Control 30 60 90 120 150 180
Rapid movement - + + + + + +
Faster opercular activity - + + + + + +
Erratic swimming - + + + + + +
Loss of balance - - - + + + +
Respiratory distress - - - - + + +
Lethargy - - - + + + +
Gulping for air - - - + + + +

1 (+) – shows behaviorial change
2 (-) – not showing behavioral change

4. Discussion

The present study investigated the toxicity of garlic powder in juvenile groupers as the basis for its application as a safe alternative treatment against disease infections in this economically important species. During the static bioassay test, the values of water parameters were within the recommended range for grouper culture (APEC/SEAFDEC, 2001). The stability of water quality during the bioassay is critical in the accuracy of lethal concentrations derived in this study (Johnson and Finley 1980).

The LC50 or median acute toxicity test determines the relative toxicity of a particular chemical or substance to various species by providing estimates of the exposure concentration causing 50% mortality in the population of the test organism at a particular time (Johnson and Finley 1980). It is a general procedure for toxicity aquaculture studies to conduct LC50 testing because it allows complete chemical equilibrium between the fish and the test water (Syngai, Dey, and Bharali 2016). In the present study, the 96-h LC50 of garlic to juvenile grouper has been determined to be 74.78 mg L-1. This value is considerably lower than 253.19 mg L-1 which is the reported 96-h LC50 of aqueous garlic extract to juvenile common carp (C. carpio) (Syngai, Dey, and Bharali 2016). The marked difference in the LC50 values can be attributed to the biological differences between the two species particularly in terms of detoxification and osmoregulation (Yeşilbudak and Erdem 2014). Findings from the present study further show the dose-dependent toxicity of A. sativum which is in agreement with other studies. For example, in the preliminary trials for acute toxicity of garlic to guppies of Fridman, Sinai, and Zilberg (2014), the survival rate was initially 30% when the fish were exposed to 20 ml L−1 for 1 h and increased to 100% after the concentration of garlic was adjusted to 12.5 ml L−1 for 1 h. It should be noted that LC50 values are species-dependent and even among conspecifics, the size, weight, sex and biological behavior further contribute to the variation (Tiwari et al. 2011). Another factor influencing the tolerance of fish to garlic is its size. Generally, larger fish can tolerate higher concentrations of chemicals and substances than smaller fish of the same species. This was evident in the study of Alam and Maughan (1995) wherein they exposed two group sizes, 3.5 and 6 cm, of carp (C. caprio) to mercury, lead, copper and nickel and found that LC50 value was significantly higher in larger fish. Grouper, in the current study, had an average size of 35 g while Fridman, Sinai, and Zilberg (2014) used 0.4 g guppy fish which has a significant weight difference and explains the higher survival in grouper. Additionally, the guppy fish (Poecilia reticulate) has a maximum tolerance of 12.5 ml L-1 aqueous garlic when immersed for 1 h which is lower than grouper (Fridman, Sinai, and Zilberg 2014). However, their exposure time is inconsistent with the experimental duration of the present study. No studies to date have investigated the acute toxicity of garlic to grouper thus comparison of sizes of conspecifics is not possible. Further studies on the toxicity of garlic to various sizes of groupers are necessary given that disease infections occur in all stages of grouper culture, from larvae to juveniles and as well as in broodstock. Moreover, higher LC50 values indicate more tolerance of fish to the experimental substance. This means that juvenile grouper have less tolerance when exposed to garlic as compared to juvenile common carp.

Changes in the behavior of fish can be assessed for determining the potential toxicity of a substance added to ambient water (Drummond and Russom 1990; Israeli-Weinstein and Kimmel 1998). Behavioral changes in the results were consistent with those reported by Syngai, Dey, and Bharali (2016) who also used the same technique to evaluate the toxicity of garlic to common carp C. carpio and they observed behaviors such as slow swimming, decreased response to external stimuli and faster opercular activity. Slow swimming behavior, lethargy, loss of balance and weak response to a stimulus can be associated with the inhibition of acetylcholine as garlic juice was found to have a relaxant effect on the smooth muscles such as the intestines, aorta and heart according to the results of Aqel, Gharaibah, and Salhab (1991). Additionally, the fish surfaces on the water and gulps for air to alternatively collect oxygen to compensate for the energy demand and erratically swims in the aquaria. These reactions may be an avoidant instinct as fish attempts to avoid contact with the toxicant (Kaur and Dua 2014; Patil and David 2008). Faster opercular movement may indicate a deficiency in oxygen intake which may be a result of hyperplasia, hypertrophy and aneurysm of the gills that limit the gas exchange (Tiwari et al. 2011). Shivakumar & David (2004) mentioned that this behavior compensates for increased physiological activities in the exposure to toxic conditions.

This paper is the first to report the toxicity of garlic on grouper particularly the lethal concentration values, and behavioral effects, which are critical information to enable the application of garlic against grouper diseases. It has been reported that garlic can effectively eliminate Ichthyopthirius, a ubiquitous protozoan parasite in fish, at 62.5 mg L-1 (Buchmann, Jensen, and Kruse 2003). Taken together, this shows the strong potential of garlic to treat diseases in groupers and thus should be further investigated.

5. Conclusion

The LC50 of garlic Allium sativum powder to orange-spotted grouper E. coioides juveniles is 74.78 mg L-1. This can serve as a baseline value for comparing toxicity bioassays of A. sativum to other species and the data can be used for future alternative therapy for fish diseases. It is suggested that ammonia levels must be included in the water parameters which may also have been attributed to the deaths of fish.


Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the Government of Japan Trust Fund GoJ-TF6 (8400-T-RD-FH0215) for supporting and funding this research. In addition, the authors extend their thanks to Mr. Peter Palma for his time in carefully reviewing our manuscript. Thanks are due to Mr. Elvis Biñas for his technical assistance.

Submitted: March 04, 2022 CEST

Accepted: April 25, 2022 CEST

References

Alam, MK, and OE Maughan. 1995. “Acute Toxicity of Heavy Metals to Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio).” Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A: Environmental Science and Engineering and Toxicology 30 (8): 1807–16.
Google Scholar
Aly, S. M., and M. F. Mohamed. 2010. “Echinacea Purpurea and Allium Sativum as Immunostimulants in Fish Culture Using Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus).” Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94 (5): 31–39. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1439-0396.2009.00971.x.
Google Scholar
Amagase, Harunobu, Brenda L. Petesch, Hiromichi Matsuura, Shigeo Kasuga, and Yoichi Itakura. 2001. “Intake of Garlic and Its Bioactive Components.” Journal of Nutrition 131 (3): 955S-962S. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1093/​jn/​131.3.955s.
Google Scholar
Amorim, Patrícia, Pedro Sousa, Ernesto Jardim, and Gui M. Menezes. 2019. “Sustainability Status of Data-Limited Fisheries: Global Challenges for Snapper and Grouper.” Frontiers in Marine Science 6 (October):654. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3389/​fmars.2019.00654.
Google Scholar
Ankri, Serge, and David Mirelman. 1999. “Antimicrobial Properties of Allicin from Garlic.” Microbes and Infection 1 (2): 125–29. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​s1286-4579(99)80003-3.
Google Scholar
APEC/SEAFDEC (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation/Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Centre). 2001. “Husbandry and Health Management of Grouper. APEC: Singapore and SEAFDEC: Iloilo, Philippines. Aquaculture Department.” In Report of the APEC/NACA Group Research Asia-Pacific, 143–51. Bangkok, Thailand.
Google Scholar
APHA (American Water Works Association), AWWA (American Water Works Association), and WEF (Water Environment Federation). 2012. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington: American Public Health Association.
Google Scholar
Aqel, M.B., M.N. Gharaibah, and A.S. Salhab. 1991. “Direct Relaxant Effects of Garlic Juice on Smooth and Cardiac Muscles.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 33 (1–2): 13–19. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0378-8741(91)90154-6.
Google Scholar
Buchmann, K., P. B. Jensen, and K. D. Kruse. 2003. “Effects of Sodium Percarbonate and Garlic Extract on Ichthyophthirius Multifiliis Theronts and Tomocysts: In Vitro Experiments.” North American Journal of Aquaculture 65 (1): 21–24. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1577/​1548-8454(2003)065.
Google Scholar
Corzo-Martinez, M, N Corzo, and M Villamiel. 2007. “Biological Properties of Onions and Garlic.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 18 (12): 609–25. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.tifs.2007.07.011.
Google Scholar
Drummond, Robert A., and Christine L. Russom. 1990. “Behavioral Toxicity Syndromes: A Promising Tool for Assessing Toxicity Mechanisms in Juvenile Fathead Minnows.” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 9 (1): 37–46. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​etc.5620090106.
Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2020. “The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020.” Sustainability in Action, 3–5.
Google Scholar
Feldberg, R S, S C Chang, A N Kotik, M Nadler, Z Neuwirth, D C Sundstrom, and N H Thompson. 1988. “In Vitro Mechanism of Inhibition of Bacterial Cell Growth by Allicin.” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 32 (12): 1763–68. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1128/​aac.32.12.1763.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Finney, D.J. 1971. Probit Analysis. Third edition. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Google Scholar
Foysal, Md Javed, Ravi Fotedar, Chin-Yen Tay, and Sanjay Kumar Gupta. 2019. “Dietary Supplementation of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetica Illucens) Meal Modulates Gut Microbiota, Innate Immune Response and Health Status of Marron (Cherax Cainii, Austin 2002) Fed Poultry-by-Product and Fishmeal Based Diets.” PeerJ 7 (May):e6891. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.7717/​peerj.6891.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Fridman, S., T. Sinai, and D. Zilberg. 2014. “Efficacy of Garlic Based Treatments against Monogenean Parasites Infecting the Guppy (Poecilia Reticulata (Peters)).” Veterinary Parasitology 203 (1–2): 51–58. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.vetpar.2014.02.002.
Google Scholar
Hussein, M.M.A., H.W. Hamdy, and I.M. Moussa. 2013. “Potential Use of Allicin (Garlic, Allium Sativum Linn, Essential Oil) against Fish Pathogenic Bacteria and Its Safety for Monosex Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus).” Journal of Food Agriculture Environment 11:696–99.
Google Scholar
Israeli-Weinstein, Dorith, and Eitan Kimmel. 1998. “Behavioral Response of Carp (Cyprinus Carpio) to Ammonia Stress.” Aquaculture 165 (1): 81–93. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​s0044-8486(98)00251-8.
Google Scholar
Johnson, W.W., and M.T. Finley. 1980. “Handbook of Acute Toxicity of Chemicals to Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates: Summaries of Toxicity Tests Conducted at Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory, 1965-78.” U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
Kaur, Rajbir, and Anish Dua. 2014. “96 h LC50, Behavioural Alterations and Histopathological Effects Due to Wastewater Toxicity in a Freshwater Fish Channa Punctatus.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22 (7): 5100–5110. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11356-014-3710-1.
Google Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Yeol, and Yang Gao. 2012. “Review of the Application of Garlic, Allium Sativum, in Aquaculture.” Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 43 (4): 447–58. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1749-7345.2012.00581.x.
Google Scholar
Marte, C.L. 2002. “Grouper Research at the Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Aquaculture Department (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation & Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific (Eds.)).” Conference paper presented at the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific.
Militz, Thane A., Paul C. Southgate, Alexander G. Carton, and Kate S. Hutson. 2013. “Dietary Supplementation of Garlic (Allium Sativum) to Prevent Monogenean Infection in Aquaculture.” Aquaculture 408–409 (September):95–99. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aquaculture.2013.05.027.
Google Scholar
Palma, P.P., E.R. Cruz-Lacierda, and V.L. Corre. 2015. “The Use of Potassium Permanganate against Trichodiniasis on Milkfish (Chanos Chanos) Fingerlings.” Bulletin-European Association of Fish Pathologists 35 (6): 201–7.
Google Scholar
Patil, V, and M David. 2008. “Behaviour and Respiratory Dysfunction as an Index of Malathion Toxicity in the Freshwater Fish, Labeo Rohita (Hamilton).” Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 8:233–37.
Google Scholar
Peña, N., A. Auró, and H. Sumano. 1988. “A Comparative Trial of Garijc, Its Extract and Ammonium-Potassium Tartrate as Antheijviintics in Carp.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 24 (2–3): 199–203. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0378-8741(88)90152-3.
Google Scholar
R, Shivakumar, and David M. 2004. “Toxicity of Endosulfan to the Freshwater Fish, Cyprinus Carpio.” Indian Journal of Ecology 31 (1): 27–29.
Google Scholar
Rabinkov, Aharon, Talia Miron, David Mirelman, Meir Wilchek, Sabina Glozman, Ephraim Yavin, and Lev Weiner. 2000. “S-Allylmercaptoglutathione: The Reaction Product of Allicin with Glutathione Possesses SH-Modifying and Antioxidant Properties.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1499 (1–2): 144–53. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​s0167-4889(00)00119-1.
Google Scholar
Rahman, T, MMR Akanda, MM Rahman, and MBR Chowdhury. 2009. “Evaluation of the Efficacies of Selected Antibiotics and Medicinal Plants on Common Bacterial Fish Pathogens.” Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 7 (1): 163–68. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3329/​jbau.v7i1.4980.
Google Scholar
Reverter, M., N. Bontemps, D. Lecchini, B. Banaigs, and P. Sasal. 2014. “Use of Plant Extracts in Fish Aquaculture as an Alternative to Chemotherapy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.” Aquaculture 433 (September):50–61. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aquaculture.2014.05.048.
Google Scholar
Sadovy de Mitcheson, Yvonne, Matthew T Craig, Athila A Bertoncini, Kent E Carpenter, William W L Cheung, John H Choat, Andrew S Cornish, et al. 2012. “Fishing Groupers towards Extinction: A Global Assessment of Threats and Extinction Risks in a Billion Dollar Fishery.” Fish and Fisheries 14 (2): 119–36. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1467-2979.2011.00455.x.
Google Scholar
Sadovy, Y. 2020. “Regional Survey for Fry/Fingerling Supply and Current Practices for Grouper Mariculture: Evaluating Current Status and Long-Term Prospects for Grouper Mariculture in South East Asia.” Final report to the Collaboration APEC grouper reseach and development network (FWG 01/99).
Sahu, S., B. K. Das, B. K. Mishra, J. Pradhan, and N. Sarangi. 2007. “Effect of Allium Sativum on the Immunity and Survival of Labeo Rohita Infected with Aeromonas Hydrophila.” Journal of Applied Ichthyology 23 (1): 80–86. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1439-0426.2006.00785.x.
Google Scholar
Srinivasan, M.R. 2004. “Probit Analysis.” In Electronic Manual on Pesticides and Environment”, edited by S. Palaniswamy, S. Kuttalam, S. Chandrsassekaran, Kennedy JS, and M.R. Srinivasan. Coimbatore, India: Department of Agricultural Entomology Tamil Nadu Agricultural University.
Google Scholar
Syngai, G.G., S Dey, and R. Bharali. 2016. “Evaluation of Toxicity Levels of the Aqueous Extract of Allium Sativum and Its Effects on the Behavior of Juvenile Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio) L., 1758.” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 9:417–21.
Google Scholar
Tiwari, M., N.S. Nagpure, D.N. Saksena, R. Kumar, Singh SP, and B. Kushwaha. 2011. “Evaluation of Acute Toxicity Levels and Ethological Responses under Heavy Metal Cadmium Exposure in Freshwater Teleost, Channa Punctata (Bloch).” International Journal of Aquatic Science 2 (1): 36–47.
Google Scholar
Valladão, G. M. R., S. U. Gallani, and F. Pilarski. 2015. “Phytotherapy as an Alternative for Treating Fish Disease.” Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 38 (5): 417–28. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​jvp.12202.
Google Scholar
Van Hai, Ngo. 2015. “The Use of Medicinal Plants as Immunostimulants in Aquaculture: A Review.” Aquaculture 446 (September):88–96. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aquaculture.2015.03.014.
Google Scholar
Yeşilbudak, Burcu, and Cahit Erdem. 2014. “Cadmium Accumulation in Gill, Liver, Kidney and Muscle Tissues of Common Carp, Cyprinus Carpio, and Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis Niloticus.” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 92 (5): 546–50. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00128-014-1228-3.
Google Scholar

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system